October 13, 2009
I am so pleased to have met many of you at our recent events (e.g., Waterlife
screening and the Detroit River Seminar)! It is encouraging to see so
many people interested in learning more about the issues facing the
Detroit River Area of Concern as well as the Great Lakes. Over 240
people attended the screening of Waterlife.
Since the screening, I have received several inquiries about the
documentary. It is now available for purchase--ask your local film
store if they can order it for you. For more information about the
documentary or to organize a screening of your own, please visit www.ourwaterlife.com.
Remember, we love to hear from you! Please email
your environmental events/news or newsletter suggestions. Depending on
timing, we can include your event in our newsletter or on our events calendar.
Natalie Green, RAP Coordinator
postmaster@detroitriver.ca
Did you know??
...that the DRCC has prepared a draft Detroit River Canadian Stage 2 Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Report?Does delisting mean clean?
Article by John Jackson - Great Lakes United
Originally published July 6, 2009 - www.glu.org
Let's celebrate! Your
Great Lakes toxic hotspot is about to be erased from the International Joint
Commission's Areas of Concern map. In three instances this celebration has
occurred. For forty other communities, grit and hard work is trying to bring
that day forward.
But what does it mean to be delisted?
As we work to meet a clean up objective that ensures the area is "fishable,
swimmable and drinkable", isn't it reasonable for the public to make the
assumption that we have met those targets when we announce that the toxic
hotspot is being delisted? Of course it is. Yet, even when delisted,
communities still face fishing advisories and the water must be treated before
it is drinkable.
Fishable?
The first area of concern to be delisted was Collingwood Harbour in Ontario in
1994. Fifteen years later, the provincial government's guide to sports fish
consumption still calls on people to avoid or limit their consumption of fish
caught in the harbour.
These warnings are the result of the levels of mercury, PCBs, mirex,
pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and dioxins and furans measured
in the fish. For example, the Ministry of the Environment asserts that
"sensitive populations" should not eat any pink salmon or whitefish that are
over 45 centimetres (18 inches) in length caught in Collingwood Harbour.
How can Collingwood Harbour be considered 'cleaned up' if the fish are still
contaminated with a toxic soup of chemicals and metals?
An Area of Concern can be officially delisted if it is determined that the
contamination of the fish is no longer a result of local sources. Instead, the
fish consumption advisory is as a result of contaminants washing in from the
lake or dropping from the air from sources outside of the area.
When the announcement was made in July 2006 that the lower Oswego River in New
York State was no longer an area of concern, Dr. Christopher De Rosa, then
Director of the Division of Toxicology for the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry, urged the governments to be cautious in their
announcements so as to not mislead the public into thinking that the waters are
now truly "fishable" without limitation. He pointed out that we should still be
warning people to limit their fish consumption.
Swimmable and drinkable?
Severn Sound, which is in a major cottage and tourist area in southern Georgian
Bay in Ontario, was delisted in January 2003. The report that justified the
delisting said that the objective for swimmability "can be considered to have
been met."
This conclusion was reached despite the fact that the same report stated all
swimming areas in Georgian Bay Islands continue to be posted "swim at own risk"
and that the area off the Coldwater River wharf is posted "No Swimming:
Contaminated Water." Midland Beach bacteria levels exceeded provincial
standards in 5 to 10 percent of the samples. In other words the area was
delisted despite the fact that it is only swimmable in some places, some of the
time.
Similarly, the drinkable goal doesn't mean that you can go and drink straight
from the waters. For example, Michigan's guidelines for delisting state that
the "drinkable" goal is met if the water is safe to drink after the use of
standard water treatment methods. A similar criterion for the drinking water
goal is found in all jurisdictions.
What needs to happen after delisting?
We must be cautious when we delist an area of concern. We must make sure that
our celebratory news announcements are tempered with cautions to the residents
that they should not assume that the waters are now "fishable, swimmable and
drinkable" without restriction.
In addition, at the same time as we celebrate the delisting of the toxic
hotspot, we need to publicly commit ourselves - as governments, industry,
environmental groups and the public who worked on the RAP - to continue with
our work in at least three areas.
Firstly, we must work in the broader Great Lakes arena for the elimination of
pollution sources beyond our area of concern that are affecting the local area.
As Collingwood Harbour demonstrates, contamination doesn't follow city limits.
Our communities are interconnected and only by eliminating pollution can we
truly overcome the toxic burden.
Secondly, we must work for continued improvement of the area so that the
environment is enhanced beyond current conditions. Meeting the minimum
standards of cleanliness is no different than celebrating a 'C' grade on a
report card. Delisting isn't the end of a journey, it's the start of a new
effort to truly revitalize a community that has turned its toxic tide. We must
take advantage of the momentum delisting creates.
Finally, we must be strong watchdogs to ensure that there is no backsliding and
that no new threats are introduced to the former area of concern. Delisting
isn't immunity. New threats are constantly emerging. We must use the knowledge
and experience gained through the past to safeguard us against the threats of
the future, and to act swiftly when pollution problems re-emerge.
Delisting is a time for celebration. But this must not be blind revelry; it
must include cautions and long-term commitments. The pride of the community and
the effort of the people whose hard work made the celebration possible deserve
nothing less.
Great Lakes United is an international
coalition promoting and coordinating basin-wide initiatives to protect and
restore the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River ecosystem. Visit their website for more information.
Save the Date...
A Day of Horticulture
After a light lunch the Guest Speaker will be "Dugald Cameron, Owner
and President of GardenImport Inc. of
Richmond Hill, Ontario. Dugald is an expert presenter at Canada Blooms and will discuss
"Spring Flowering Bulbs and Perennials for Fall Planting".
Tickets that include a light lunch are $12 at the door. For additional
information contact Linda Christy by phone at 519-972-5888.
OPEN HOUSE: draft Detroit River Canadian Stage 2 Remedial Action Plan Report
October 27-29, 2009 - Locations vary, see below
The DRCC will be hosting an open house in each of the
Canadian municipalities adjacent to the Detroit River (Oct. 27-29, 2009). At
the open houses, visitors will be able to obtain more information about the RAP
Report and the DRCC as well as ask questions and submit their written comments. You can also submit your comments online.
The Open Houses run from 3:30 pm to 7:30 pm on each of
the days below.
A brief presentation will be given at 6 pm.
Environmental Job Postings
(note: the links will expire after the deadline closes.)
|
email: postmaster@detroitriver.ca |